requestId:684c3e2a3bafc7.51041541.
Published hundreds of articles in international core journals, and served as the certification of “Confucianism” in famous universities. Author: Wang Zechun
Source: “National Research and Research” Volume 42 (Beijing Major Study, 2020)
Time: Confucius was the Gengzi Pu in 2570 On the third day of the month, Jiazi
He also bought a website according to the “Shi Wen Jiezi” “Shi Wen Jiezi” “Shi Wen Jiezi” “Shi Wen Jiezi” and “Crazy Confucianism” in “History of History The “Zhan Yashi” is called “Zhan Yashi” in the href=”https://twbabyhoney520.org/”>Baoqing Notes” and it is concluded that Confucianism is equivalent to alchemist; and alchemist refers to all those with Taoism. Therefore, Confucianism, who is considered to be “famous”, is the statute of the pre-Qin Scriptures, and can cover all thinking doors and prescription skills. However, the information used by Taiyan lacks the indecent point to prove this indecent point, that is, there is no “Confucian” that can cover all thinking and art skills. “Confucian” is just a special name of Confucius’ school.
Author Introduction
Wang Zechun, born in 1988, is from Qixian County, Shanxi Province. He served as a concurrent teacher in the Department of Philosophy of the Marxist School of Political Science and Law in Northeast China, and the purpose of the discussion was to pre-Qin philosophy and Confucian history.
The concept of “Confucianism” is a concept that is rarely seen in modern Chinese thinking, but Zhu Zong thought that “what is the original meaning of “Confucianism”? People who ordinary people talk about Chinese ci history and advocate the guidance of Confucianism seem to have not given us a relatively satisfactory explanation”[1]. Zhang Taiyan’s “Original Confucianism” is a major article in modern times that has stopped studying “Confucianism” [2]. Zhang Taiyan considered “the meaning of Confucianism is very broad”[3]. Among them, Confucianism, as a “famous name”, can refer to all the thinking doors and prescription skills. Zhang Taiyan’s article has a profound influence, which has attracted the attention of many scholars, butEach has its own differences in the key points [4]. Regarding Zhang Taiyan’s indecent point, it may be understood and conspired, or it may be raised or it may be denied. The following author briefly introduces the above-mentioned scholars’ discussion on the purpose of the topic.
Understanding the indecent point of becoming Zhang Taiyan. Although Hu Xing did not agree with Zhang Taiyan’s “Original Confucianism” in “Speaking of Confucianism” and used it to do so, he thought that “Taiyan Teacher Chief Teacher said: ‘The name of Confucianism is an alchemist in ancient times’, and this statement is not suspicious.” [5]
Understanding the indecent point of not neglecting Zhang Taiyan. Guo Moruo thought: “The evidence of the altar scholars who were called Confucian before the Qin Dynasty… Confucianism should have been the special number of the ‘Zheng Lu scholars, the chief teachers and teachers of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of Guo Moruo, Guo Moruo thought: “The ancient meaning of Confucianism that modern people have recommended from the explanation of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of the rank of Guo Moruo, is actually just a misunderstanding” [7], and there is no Confucianism that “all those who have learned are all affected.”
This article is based on the indecent point of Guo Moruo and Yu Zong, thinking that “Confucianism” cannot contain all the thinking and prescription skills in modern times, but is just a special name of Confucius’ school. There is no analysis of other topics, and no discussion on the source topics of Confucianism [8]. The research method does not adopt the method of textual training [9]; it only stops analyzing and certifying the data cited by Zhang Taiyan through the process, and evaluates the meaning represented by the concept of “Confucianism” in the detailed use of the Han Dynasty and previous periods.
One
Zhang Taiyan’s first statement in which he described “Confucianism” as “the alchemist” is the comparison of “the alchemist” in “Shi Wenjiezi”. Xu Shen did not go one step further to explain the meaning of “the alchemist”. Zhang Taiyan did not stop analyzing the “Alchemy Master”. He directly said that all Taoist craftsmanship can include “Tao, Mo, criminal law, Yinyang, and immortals, and there are records of the genius and recorded in the journal”[10], which is not what the Emperor Zhuzong thought, “Zhang took a fancy to the ‘Alchemy Master’ and called the primitive Confucian scholars as ‘Alchemy’”[11] ;The Su Zong thought that “the word ‘无’ does not necessarily refer to law and art”, and started from the word “无” in “无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无In fact, the two people’s explanation of “Yanshi” is not of practical difference. All those with Taoism are the same as those with “general reference to ‘people with Taoism’”; it’s just that the Wai Zhang Taiyan thought that all those with Taoism can include other schools of thought, and the Suzuo Sect restricted “people with Taoism” to Confucius.School.
Zhang Taiyan and Yu Zong came to a conclusion on the different “Alchemist”, which lies in their understanding of “Alchemist”. Therefore, it is necessary to express the meaning of “家安” in “Shi Wen Jiezi”. There are two important ways to define the meaning of “Yanshi”. One is the method of textual training, which is used by the Yuzong; the other is the method of material retrieval [14].
The proof of the Ching Zong seems to be serious and has detailed information, but a careful analysis will reveal the topic. First of all, the “Shi Wen Jiezi” used “Shi Wen Jiezi” to explain the “art” of “Yaoshi” in contrast to his familiarity with the entire body of “Shi Wen Jiezi”. He believed that: “The book “Shi Wen” is often expressed by people, and sometimes it also contains some words of discussion and rationality, and it is not a complete source of words” [15]. Secondly, although there is an explanation of “无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无无The topic that exists is “One is that the font meaning of neglecting text is often extended and evolved, and the other is that from the previous step to deduce the next step, there is only ability but no certainty, so it is still to be confirmed in the material. The learning style of the Ruan Yuan system considers this ability to be considered as certainty, and will be more The conditions and conditions of the meaning are considered as conditions and conditions of the meaning. “[17] Again, even if the “alphabetist” is “people with Taoism”, the pre-Qin monks were all Taoists, but other monks were eliminated, including Taoism named “Tao”. As long as the Confucius school was the “people with Taoism” he thought. Therefore, the “Confucian” mentioned by the Emperor Zhuzong is just the conclusion of the Confucius School’s special title, but from the “Confucianism, the name of the alchemist”, the “alchemist” is described as “people with Taoism”, and then the “people with Taoism” is equivalent to the intricacies of the Confucius School’s argument.
Another way is the material retrieval method, which is a concept called Xu Xie’s indecent “let’s behave”. He believed that: “In this way, it is not a symposium of character shape or word sound on the arm, but the meaning obtained by character shape and word sound is in the structure of a sentence and in the high and low text of a chapter, so as to find that the text is smooth from the characters. In addition, a step will be to refer to the relevant materials of a certain period, a certain book, After reviewing the relevant materials of a certain company, they are more different and interrogated, so as to achieve a more realistic conclusion in a broader landscape and basic way. ”[18]
In “Historical Records” and “Han Books”, many alchemists refer to alchemists. In other two pre-Qin Chinese literatures, the alchemist also refers to a
發佈留言